Recent editorials from Alabama newspapers:
The Times Daily on Gov. Kay Ivey's plans for new Alabama prisons:
Gov. Kay Ivey is plowing ahead full speed with a plan to have private companies build new prisons that the state would then lease from them.
It’s the simplest plan with the least hassle. It’s also the plan with the least transparency and accountability because it bypasses the Alabama Legislature.
Ivey maintains that under state law, she can enter into lease contracts without legislative approval. Setting aside the specific issue of prison construction, this is a matter the state Legislature needs to address.
When it comes to routine transactions — such as, for example, leasing office equipment — the state’s executive branch doesn’t need lawmakers second-guessing every decision. But building and leasing new prisons is a $1 billion proposition. That’s not something the governor’s office, regardless of its occupant, should be able to undertake unilaterally.
The advantage of Ivey’s plan to lease prisons is that by shutting out the Legislature, she avoids the squabbling over which existing prisons are closed and where to build the new ones. Legislators tend to like prisons in their districts because they regard them as jobs programs for their constituents.
The disadvantage is it allows a single person — the governor — to dictate policy and do so in secret.
Ivey’s office has refused to disclose details of the bids it has solicited, citing the usual concerns about the sensitivity of business negotiations and the like, in effect daring the news media to sue for what should be public information, knowing the outcome of such a suit will come too late to matter.
In theory, Alabama has one of the best open records laws in the nation. In practice, however, it is enforceable only by a long and expensive legal process. It has no internal enforcement mechanism. This is something else the state Legislature needs to address.
The Alabama Department of Corrections said the successful developer team or teams will be announced this summer and the financial terms will be announced in the fall.
Additionally, some lawmakers are worried that, within all this secrecy, is a plan to turn the running of the state’s prisons over to private companies.
Sen. Cam Ward, R-Alabaster, said he plans to send Ivey’s office a letter this week asking if contracting out prison services is an option she’s considering, or in bids recently submitted to the Department of Corrections.
“I’m just going to ask point blank,” Ward said. “I am going to be 100% opposed to privately run prisons. That’s a big policy shift that the Legislature should be involved in.”
Ivey’s office maintains the state will continue to run the prisons, but lawmakers and voters shouldn’t have to take such issues simply on faith.
Ultimately, however, the central issue is the governor seems bent on committing the state to a major undertaking without the Legislature approving a dime. That is not how our government works — or at least it shouldn’t be.
“I think we’re all very leery about spending $1 billion-plus on prisons and at the end of the day it still won’t be adequate enough room in the state, we’ll still be overcrowded,” said Senate Minority Leader Bobby Singleton, D-Greensboro. “If the governor wants this to happen, we’re going to have to be part of this process. Only the Legislature can appropriate money.”
But unless the Legislature acts, members may find they are appropriating money to pay bills the governor racked up on her own.
The Times-News on the importance of technology amid the pandemic:
Video conferencing services such as Zoom have quickly become household names due to the COVID-19 crisis.
These services have allowed workers to do their jobs remotely and still communicate in realtime with their co-workers and managers.
Government officials also relied on services such as Zoom to conduct their regular meetings. After all, city and state business must go on.
Schools also used these services to communicate with their teachers and students so that education could continue while the status of the remaining school year was determined.
Can you imagine how business and education would have handled a pandemic five or 10 years ago? We imagine back then the challenges and lasting impacts on our communities would’ve been even larger. That is a somewhat scary thought.
The importance of still being able to conduct business from a distance cannot be understated. However, nothing matches in-person interactions to convey thoughts, emotions and information.
That goes for business relationships. It goes for interpersonal relationships. And it goes for the relationship between government bodies and their citizens.
As our community wades into reopening the economy, government boards should also be making plans to reopen their meetings to the public.
We aren’t advocating going back to the old ways of holding in-person meetings, at least until adequate testing and vaccinations are available.
But we’ve seen from the governor’s press conferences that people can socially distance from one another while still being in the same room. They just sit or stand far apart.
We’ve also seen how reporters at those press conferences maintain their own safe distance from one another. Some form of that could be employed for attendance at public meetings.
Some vulnerable citizens, like senior citizens, should continue to avoid in person meetings for the me being to protect themselves.
It’s important that we not rush into returning to “normal,” so as not to encourage a second wave of the disease. But the suspension of live, in-person government meetings, was never intended to be permanent.
It’s important for the operation of our government that citizens be able to observe and face their public officials in person.
As we approach a return to normal, meetings should still continue to be streamed online to ensure as many citizens as possible can view them.
The more citizens that are informed the beer off this community can become.